The reservation of Hanuman’s seat in the movie “Adipurush” has become a subject of intense debate and controversy. Director Om Raut’s film, “Adipurush,” has been surrounded by controversies since its announcement, with concerns raised about its characters and alleged distortions of facts. Even after its release, the controversy surrounding the film shows no signs of subsiding. Arun Govil, known for his iconic portrayal of Lord Ram in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana, has joined the debate by questioning the decision to reserve Hanuman’s seat in the theater. This article delves into the controversy, explores the reactions from various individuals, and sheds light on the underlying concerns.
The Reservation of Hanuman’s Seat in the Movie “Adipurush”
The reservation of Hanuman’s seat in the movie “Adipurush” refers to the decision made by the film’s makers to allocate a specific seat in the theater for Lord Hanuman, a revered deity in Hindu mythology. This move has raised eyebrows and sparked discussions about the appropriateness and implications of such a reservation.
Controversies Surrounding “Adipurush”
Since its announcement, “Adipurush” has faced several controversies that have contributed to the ongoing debate and skepticism surrounding the film. Concerns have been raised about the depiction of characters and the potential distortion of facts from the epic story of Ramayana. These controversies have persisted even after the film’s release, indicating the depth of public sentiment and attachment to the original narrative.
Arun Govil’s Dissatisfaction with the Creative Freedom
Arun Govil, renowned for his portrayal of Lord Ram in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana, has expressed his dissatisfaction with the “creative freedom” taken in retelling the story of Ramayana in “Adipurush.” In an exclusive interview with News18, Govil shared his thoughts on various aspects of the film, including the intentions of the makers. He firmly believes that Ramayana is a matter of faith and should not be tampered with in any way.
Why Experiment with Religion?
The dissatisfaction expressed by Arun Govil and many others regarding the film “Adipurush” stems from the belief that religion, particularly Hinduism, is a sensitive subject for Indians. Govil questions why such experimentation is done with Hinduism when other religions are left untouched. This sentiment reflects the deep emotional connection people have with their religious beliefs and the need for them to be respected.
The Makers’ Perspective
In his interview, Arun Govil further delves into the motivations of the makers of “Adipurush.” He questions why they chose to experiment with an epic story like Ramayana when there are numerous other subjects with cinematic potential. He suggests that the makers might have realized the commercial potential of the film when the teaser was released, leaving them with limited options to alter the course. Govil sees the controversies and tactics surrounding the film as a means for the makers to protect themselves and salvage the project.
Sunil Lahri’s Perspective
Sunil Lahri, who played the role of Laxman in Ramanand Sagar’s Ramayana, has also voiced his concerns about “Adipurush.” He joins Govil in questioning the motives behind the film and expresses his confusion about the thought process and target audience of the movie. Lahri believes that through this film, their own culture